How a Civil Case Thailand Courts Handle Actually Begins
A civil case Thailand courts hear starts with filing a “plaint” — but if the defendant is abroad, formal service can delay the case by a year or more before it even begins.Suing or being sued by someone in Thailand begins with the filing of a complaint (or what is most commonly referred to in Thailand as a “plaint”) against the accused defendant party, in the same Thai court system we introduced in Part 1. The complaint must contain all the facts which would be sufficient to support a legally cognizable claim against the defendant under Thai law. However, there is no need for the complaint to allege the law or laws applicable, nor to provide evidentiary support for these factual allegations. Evidence in support of the complaint presented later will be accepted by the court.
Once a complaint is filed and accepted by the court, the plaintiff must request the court to issue a summons to the defendant. It then becomes the court’s responsibility to notify the defendant of the action against him and of the time within which the defendant must reply and/or appear in court.
It should be noted that where a foreign defendant party is involved, an unfortunate circumstance often arises for the plaintiff. If a foreign defendant cannot be formally notified of the case, as required by Thai procedural law, then the plaintiff must ask the Thai government (i.e., the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) to formally request the relevant foreign government to serve the complaint and summons on the foreign defendant. A reverse process must then be effected. As a result, it usually takes a year or more (and sometimes several years) before a Thai court case against such a foreign defendant formally begins and the initial trial date is scheduled.
This delay is one of the most significant practical drawbacks of pursuing a civil case Thailand courts handle against a foreign defendant, and is a major reason many businesses consider arbitration — where service of process can often be completed directly by the arbitration provider, without government involvement — as a faster alternative.